El cambio climático no es obra del hombre. Miren a las nubes.


Por minutos, por días, los informes de CERN, de ESA, y en general 700 científicos procedentes de todas las partes de la geografía del globo, claman que se modifiquen las teorías de “Al Gore” sobre cambio climático.

En esta ocasión, la polémica ha llegado a la Casa Blanca, al Senado, y cada día se suman nuevos científicos al manifiesto, que ponen el énfasis en que son los rayos cósmicos, los causantes del cambio climático.

A pesar de todas las recientes evidencias científicas, NASA, sigue incidiendo en que el cambio climático, es obra en un 90% de la contaminación por CO2 del hombre, y para ello, prepara un informe que pretende rebatir las evidencias mostradas por ESA y CERN.

Lamentable. La comunidad científica está indignada, pues directamente afirma:

“The ­science has, quite simply, gone awry”

En los últimos dos meses, otros 59 científicos más se han sumado a las filas escépticas de la teoría “Oficial”, y desde la Unión Europea, se calcula que en los próximos dos meses otros 200 científicos más se unan también al manifiesto.

La redacción de este blog, se ha sumado también y pese a las amenazas que estamos recibiendo de sectores Oficiales, que nos intentan desacreditar científicamente, tenemos acceso a todos los estudios científicos detallados del grupo de los ya 700 escépticos.

Estamos asistiendo en estos días, a saltos cuánticos en la ciencia, tanto es así, que la concepción Oficialista, Ortodoxa, comienza a cuestionarse seriamente al amparo de las evidencias científicas. Reproducimos aquí, las conclusiones originales de los 700, e invitamos a todos aquellos que deseen investigar, a que lo hagan, nos pidan fuentes, estudios, análisis, así como los resultados de nuestras investigaciones.

La siguiente figura explica el verdadero proceso del cambio climático según CLOUD06. (CERN)

Proceso de Ionización de las nubes y cambio climático
Proceso de Ionización de las nubes y cambio climático

Seguidamente recogemos aquí, el original del texto del MR700,

Update: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims 

Outpouring of Skeptical Scientists Continues as 59 Scientists Added to Senate Report 

‘The ­science has, quite simply, gone awry’  

 

Link to Introduction of Report 

Link to Full Printable 255-Page PDF Report  

Washington, DC: Fifty-nine additional scientists from around the world have been added to the U.S. Senate Minority Report of dissenting scientists, pushing the total to over 700 skeptical international scientists – a dramatic increase from the original 650 scientists featured in the initial December 11, 2008 release. The 59 additional scientists added to the 255-page Senate Minority report since the initial release 13 ½ weeks ago represents an average of over four skeptical scientists a week.  This updated report – which includes yet another former UN IPCC scientist – represents an additional 300 (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the initial report’s release in December 2007. 

The over 700 dissenting scientists are now more than 13 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers. The 59 additional scientists hail from all over the world, including Japan, Italy, UK, Czech Republic, Canada, Netherlands, the U.S. and many are affiliated with prestigious institutions including, NASA, U.S. Navy, U.S. Defense Department, Energy Department, U.S. Air Force, the Philosophical Society of Washington (the oldest scientific society in Washington), Princeton University, Tulane University, American University, Oregon State University, U.S. Naval Academy and EPA.  

The explosion of skeptical scientific voices is accelerating unabated in 2009. A March 14, 2009 article in the Australian revealed that Japanese scientists are now at the forefront of rejecting man-made climate fears prompted by the UN IPCC.

Prominent Japanese Geologist Dr. Shigenori Maruyama, a professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences who has authored more than 125 scientific publications, said in March 2009 that “there was widespread skepticism among his colleagues about the IPCC’s fourth and latest assessment report that most of the observed global temperature increase since the mid-20th century ‘is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” Maruyama noted that when this question was raised at a Japan Geoscience Union symposium last year, ‘the result showed 90 per cent of the participants do not believe the IPCC report.”  [Also See: The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists’ equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [ See: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: ‘2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC’ & see full reports here & here –More analyses of recent developments see report’s introduction here. ]  

“I do not find the supposed scientific consensus among my colleagues,” noted Earth Scientist Dr. Javier Cuadros on March 3, 2009. Cuadros, of the UK Natural History Museum, specializes in Clay Mineralogy and has published more than 30 scientific papers.  

Award-Winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Robert H. Austin, who has published 170 scientific papers and was elected a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, lamented the current fears over global warming.

 “Unfortunately, Climate Science has become Political Science…It is tragic that some perhaps well-meaning but politically motivated scientists who should know better have whipped up a global frenzy about a phenomena which is statistically questionable at best,” Austin told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on March 2, 2009.  

‘Could turn the climate change world upside down’  

The rise in skeptical scientists are responding not only to an increase in dire “predictions” of climate change, but also a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data, and inconvenient developments have further cast doubts on the claims of man-made global warming fear activists. The latest peer-reviewed study in Geophysical Research Letters is being touted as a development that “could turn the climate change world upside down.” The study finds that the “Earth is undergoing natural climate shift.” The March 15, 2009 article in WISN.com details the research of Dr. Anastasios Tsonis of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. “We realized a lot of changes in the past century from warmer to cooler and then back to warmer were all natural,” Tsonis said. “I don’t think we can say much about what the humans are doing,” he added.

 

Tsonis further added: “The temperature has flattened and is actually going down. We are seeing a new shift towards cooler temperatures that will last for probably about three decades.” [ See also:  Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Global Warming could stop ‘for up to 30 years! Warming ‘On Hold?…’Could go into hiding for decades’ study finds – Discovery.com – March 2, 2009 ]  

Climate ‘primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms’ 

Climatologist and Paloeclimate researcher Dr. Diane Douglas, who has authored or edited over 200 technical reports, also declared natural factors are dominating climate, not CO2. “The recent ‘panic’ to control GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and billions of dollars being dedicated for the task has me deeply concerned that US, and other countries are spending precious global funds to stop global warming, when it is primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms,” Douglas, who is releasing a major new paper she authored that will be presented at a UNESCO conference in Ghent, Belgium on March 20, 2009, told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on March 10, 2009.  

Retired Award Winning NASA Atmospheric Scientist Dr. William W. Vaughan, recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, a former Division Chief of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and author of more than 100 refereed journal articles, monographs, and papers, also now points to natural causes of recent climate changes. “The cause of these global changes is fundamentally due to the Sun and its effect on the Earth as it moves about in its orbit. Not from man-made activities,” Vaughan told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on February 6, 2009.   

Geology Professor Uberto Crescenti of the University G.d’Annunzio in Italy, the past president of the Society of Italian Geologists also agrees that nature, not mankind is ruling the climate. “I think that climatic changes have natural causes according to geological data…I am very glad to sign the U.S. Senate’s report of scientists against the theory of man-made global warming,” Crescenti told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009.  

UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Steven M. Japar, a PhD atmospheric chemist who was part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second (1995) and Third (2001) Assessment Reports, and has authored 83 peer-reviewed publications and in the areas of climate change, atmospheric chemistry, air pollutions and vehicle emissions, challenged the IPCC’s climate claims.

“Temperature measurements show that the [climate model-predicted mid-troposphere] hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them!” Japar told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 7, 2009.  

Mathematical Physicist Dr. Frank Tipler, professor at Tulane University who has authored 58 peer-reviewed publications and five books, ridiculed man-made climate claims. “Whether the ice caps melt, or expand — whatever happens — the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) theorists claim it confirms their theory. A perfect example of a pseudo-science like astrology,” Tipler wrote on December 22, 2008.

Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University, and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, says the international promotion of man-made global warming fears are nearing their end. (Note: Bellamy was in the original 2007 U.S. Senate report.]  “The ­science has, quite simply, gone awry. In fact, it’s not even science any more, it’s anti-science,” Bellamy, who used to believe in man-made warming, declared on November 5, 2008.  

Acceder al MR700.

Y si no, vean ustedes mismos. Miren al cielo. Miren las nubes.

 

Ionización de las nubes. Incidencia de los rayos cósmicos. CLOUD06 (CERN)
Ionización de las nubes. Incidencia de los rayos cósmicos. CLOUD06 (CERN)

Juzguen ustedes mismos.

Fuentes:

-CERN Colloquium 4 june 2009.

US. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

-Cambridege University.

MR650

2 respuestas para “El cambio climático no es obra del hombre. Miren a las nubes.”

Los comentarios están cerrados.